Deficit of manhood

I listened to Sierakowski discussing with Ziemkiewicz, Nowacka debating with Wiper and I have a question for Barbara Nowacka and Sławomir Sierakowski: will Salafi militias require compliance with the Violent Convention or maybe Sharia?

As you know (or maybe you don’t know?) the left wing is guided in its propaganda by the so-called truth of the stage: something is proclaimed and in a moment it is turned 180 degrees without any explanation as to why it is otherwise. An example is pluralism. In the 90s of the last century, they were full of pluralism and it suddenly ended. Now they will not mention this pluralism, that it is supposed to be world-view as well. No pluralism is meant to be just genderterror.

But we do not have to falsify the reality and the problem of immigrants will not be dealt with in a three-month or six-year time horizon, but in a ten-year, twenty-year or even a hundred-year time horizon. The future is forged in the present: if someone now has a three-year-old daughter, it is important for him whether she will go to the harem or not.

And Sierakowski is not telling us the truth: he wants to initiate a process that is taking place before our eyes in the West: settling tight regions, obtaining de facto immunity, obtaining formal immunity, imposing Sharia on the rest of the population. Two thousand will not do much here, but they should inform us about the target range of emigration in the next twenty years: how many and where? In this time perspective, is it planning to hand over control over Poland to the Arabs, or only to a large part of the country? How many, according to his assessment, do immigrants need to control the country? Sierakowski did not tell us all of this.

II

I listened to some two experts on TV Republika today, despite the fact that their babbling is not suitable for listening. They argued about the methods of detecting the spikes of the caliphate that it was impossible. Muslims are certainly easy to separate, just treat them with a country sausage. Syrian Christians will consume unless on Friday. And if you ask such an Islamist, whether the present caliph is a shame worth throwing at pigs, can he deny it or not? Here a specific answer is needed. How can it not be our good. But according to multiculturalism, one cannot ask about it, because it is discrimination. However, it does not have to be this way:

I would like to remind you that Muslims came to us in a larger group under Jagiełło, they were various Tatars who settled in Lithuania. After the union, they joined us, and this settlement lasted until the 16th century. They called them Lipki and there was no big problem with them. In the 17th century, there was an argument and the honor passed to Turkey, but most immediately understood that it was better under the king than under the sultan and returned to Poland. Why?

Muslim settlement was based on clear rules: their duties and rights were strictly defined: military service but also freedom of worship, land purchase, etc. Acceptance of the Catholic and Christian character of the state. And if someone doesn’t like it, a getaway.

III

At present, the situation would be different if they required refugees to accept the Catholic nature of Poland. Ultimately, they could require the acceptance of anything, such as the secular characters of France. Nowacka and Nowicka do not, however, require immigrants to accept their gender. Yet they especially need equality and violence education. If any regime was implemented against them, for example: giving money on the condition that they would obligatorily take part in Equality Parades and classes with Ponton, it would have improved a little. But not even Szczuka with Środa, Szyszkowska and Monika Płatek postulate it.

A certain Shahid Mehdi argues publicly (http://ndie.pl/shahid-mehdi-europejki-prowokuja-seksualnie-i-pragna-naszych-gwaltow /) that European women, without wearing headscarves, “desire rapes” and no voice the protest did not rise. Has he risen? The Feminist Eyeopener is silent about it. Where does this approval come from, so far silent?

Men in Europe (and America) recently, under the influence of various such transformations there, are losing their masculine features and began to be lacking. That is why they bring the so-called real men: aggressive, beating, raping, etc. At the same time, the assumption that someone is controlling it is incorrect: just as lowering the temperature below zero causes the water to freeze, the need here causes a reaction. According to official reports, 75% of immigrants are men of draft age, 13% are women and 12% are children.

IV

Immigrants feel that they are entitled to them for various reasons. One: Europe has collapsed on colonization and they are plundering zagrabienno. Two: when you give food, you have to take it. Three: multicultural. They do not accept multiculturalism as a way of organizing societies. They accept European degenerates voluntarily giving money as a sucker. and European women who allow themselves to be raped and forbid even protest against it (in Sweden it is 3 years old).

The issue of Caliph Omar’s decree remains to be clarified. Caliph Omar was to issue a decree that the locals would support traveling Muslims in the capture areas. Poland is a conquered area because there is a mosque here and that is why we have a duty to support newcomers. They should be like a doghouse. Let Sierakowski explain it.

Finally, for the Lemmings, a summary in points:

1. Immigrants are opposed to gender.
2. Immigrants are pissed off, have a demanding attitude and are driven by sharia.
3. They are guided not only privately by Sharia, but consider it to be the basic norm of social life.
4. Feminists and other genders recognize the superiority of Sharia over feminism and gender.
5. Multikulti is treated instrumentally by the newcomers. Likewise, it was hot.

Here is Stanisław Michalkiewicz discussing geopolitical aspects:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlLG624SWps

I wrote about why genderists place Islam above gender:

http://smocze.opary.salon24.pl/662617,panstwo-wyznaniowe – Links to Wipler and Ziemkiewicz:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x34p8r8_przemyslaw-wipler-vs- barbara-nowacka_
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i15c5WcO9RM

Number of views:
5